Meetings and Feedback14/09/2026Núcleo de Gestão e Processos5 min readUpdated on 15/09/2026

Stay interview: questions and an action plan before resignation

A practical guide to running stay interviews, spotting possible exit signals, and turning the conversation into actions with owners, deadlines, and clear limits.

Gestora conversa com colaborador em uma reunião individual, com notebook e caderno sobre a mesa em um escritório iluminado.

A stay interview is a structured conversation between a manager and an employee to understand what sustains their connection to the job, what is wearing that connection down, and which realistic actions could improve the employee experience before dissatisfaction turns into a resignation. SHRM describes it as an individual discussion led by a manager to identify actions the leader can take to strengthen engagement and retention.

What a stay interview is — and what it is not

It does not replace recurring one-on-ones, performance reviews, engagement surveys, or exit interviews. Its focus is specific: identifying reasons to stay and possible reasons to leave while there is still time to act.

  • It is not a performance review: avoid turning the meeting into a discussion about missed targets. SHRM recommends keeping stay interviews separate from performance meetings.
  • It is not an interrogation: open questions, listening, and follow-up probes work better than a mechanical checklist.
  • It is not a promise to retain someone at any cost: managers should distinguish what they can decide from what depends on policy, budget, HR, or senior leadership.
  • It is not an early exit interview: it should also explore what already works and should be preserved.

How to prepare the conversation

Choose a private setting without interruptions. SHRM materials indicate that many stay interviews can take about 20 minutes, although blocking 30 minutes on the calendar is sensible. The meeting tends to work best when the direct manager leads it and explains that the purpose is to understand what can be preserved, improved, or escalated.

Explain the purpose in advance, but avoid sending a rigid form to be completed beforehand. Enter with light hypotheses, not conclusions. Record only relevant themes, decisions, and next steps.

A short question script

  1. What currently makes staying on this team or at this company worthwhile for you?
  2. Which parts of your work give you the most energy? Which drain it?
  3. What recurring frustration would you like me to understand better?
  4. Is anything missing in your development, recognition, autonomy, or opportunities?
  5. When was the last time you seriously thought about leaving? What triggered that thought?
  6. What could I do differently as your manager to improve your experience?
  7. If we could make one realistic change in the next 30 days, which one would matter most?

After an important answer, probe further: “Can you give me an example?”, “How often does that happen?”, “What impact does it have on your work?”, “What would noticeable improvement look like?” and “Which part of this is within our control?”. SHRM likewise emphasizes listening, probing, and note-taking.

Signals by theme: what to listen for and how to respond

ThemeSignalsPossible next action
Workload and prioritiesRecurring overtime, constant urgency, conflicting prioritiesReorder priorities, remove or delay work, and review capacity
Manager relationshipReluctance to raise issues, feedback only when something goes wrong, surprise decisionsAdjust check-in cadence, feedback, and decision context
GrowthFeeling stuck, little learning, responsibilities that never materializeMap skills and development projects; do not promise a promotion
Recognition and purposeWork feels invisible, weak connection to outcomesMake impact visible and agree on meaningful forms of recognition
CompensationMarket comparisons, perceived pay gaps or unfairnessDocument, explain the current process, and escalate; do not promise a raise
Flexibility and routineSchedule conflicts, commute burden, work-life constraintsCheck policy, coverage needs, and feasible alternatives
Team and environmentPersistent conflict, excessive meetings, interruptions, low trustAddress processes and working agreements; escalate conduct issues when needed

Turn the conversation into an action plan

A good conversation loses value when nothing happens afterward. At the end, choose up to three priorities. For each one, record a concrete action, who owns it, when there will be an update, and how you will know whether things improved.

PriorityActionOwnerDeadlineImprovement signal
Too many simultaneous demandsReprioritize the queue and remove two deliverables from the current cycleManagerBy the next weekly meetingFewer competing urgent tasks
Low exposure to strategic workInclude the employee in a role-appropriate project and define a concrete contributionManager + employeeDefine within 30 daysClear scope and learning
Compensation concernTake the issue through the formal review process and return with status and criteriaManager + HR, per policyDate agreed in the meetingProcess and next milestone understood

What the manager should not promise

Hearing a need does not mean having the authority to meet it. Avoid turning empathy into a commitment the organization may not be able to honor, especially around raises or bonuses, promotion, permanent changes to working hours or location, headcount, reduced targets, budget, and absolute confidentiality when a matter requires escalation.

Use three categories: I can decide, I can propose or escalate, and I cannot promise. When something depends on others, agree on what will be escalated and when the employee will hear back, without guaranteeing the outcome.

How to close the interview

Recap what you heard and confirm that your summary is accurate. Select priorities, assign owners, and schedule the next follow-up. Then deliver what was agreed or explain promptly why something changed. The practice gains credibility less from perfect questions than from showing that the conversation leads to decisions, escalation, or clear answers.

If serious conduct, harassment, discrimination, safety, fraud, or possible policy-violation issues emerge, stop treating them only as retention topics and follow the organization’s HR, compliance, safety, or leadership channels.

When to repeat it

You do not need to wait for explicit signs that someone may leave. Stay interviews can be used periodically and at higher-friction moments such as a manager change, reorganization, workload spike, return from leave, or a major scope change. The cadence should leave enough time for action between conversations and should not turn the meeting into an empty ritual.

Sources and references

Topics in this articleentrevista de permanênciafeedbackgestão de pessoasliderançaretenção de talentosstay interview